Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
BANKS v ROE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017mc00620
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00604
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017mc00515
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Frederick Banks v. Mark Wietzman, et al
as 17-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: MARK G. WIETZMAN, Esq., DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv04176
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BANKS v. DISNEY et al
as 2:2016mc00650
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: DISNEY, DISNEY RESPORTS, ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
WARREN et al v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv01089
Plaintiff: DANIEL WARREN and JASON SWIDERSKI
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, JOHN A. BROWN, MARGARET FERRARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. WIETZMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016mc00058
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: MARK G. WIETZMAN, DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE and others
BANKS v. HICKTON et al
as 2:2015mc00885
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent: DAVID HICKTON, ROBERT CESSAR, JUDGE MARK HORNAK and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?