Cases 1 - 10 of 1,968
Routh v. Johson
as 2:2024cv02079
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Routh, Jr.
Respondent:
Judge Christine Johson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estes v. Tabor et al
as 2:2024cv02076
Plaintiff:
Shaun Jermaine Estes
Defendant:
Judge Stephen Tabor, Court CLerk Susie Hassett, Prosecutor Daniel Shue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cummings
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Gary Musselwhite, Robert Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Rogers
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Robert Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Layne v. Wellpath Medical et al
as 6:2024cv06082
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthew Layne
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical and RN Kelly Aunspaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Roberts v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04049
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Leon Roberts
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Dixon v. Roberts
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Darius Santwann Dixon
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
James Robert Chaney
Defendant:
Branden Davis, Dale Reed, Antonio D Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
