Cases 1 - 10 of 33
NELSON WORLDWIDE, LLC v. PINBAR ARCHITECTURE, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03728
Plaintiff:
NELSON WORLDWIDE, LLC
Defendant:
PINBAR ARCHITECTURE, LLC, ROBERT WILSON AUSDENMOORE and ROBERT ANTHONY RINK
DENT v. PARISI et al
as 5:2023cv02675
Petitioner:
ROBERT WILSON DENT
Respondent:
THOMAS G. PARISI, ELLEN R. WEST, TIMOTHY J. MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DENT v. IRWIN
as 1:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
RICHARD WILSON DENT and ROBERT WILSON DENT
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN, ELLIOT L. SMEAL, DANIEL McCARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DENT v. MORRIS et al
as 5:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON DENT
Defendant:
TIMOTHY J. MORRIS, DARREN SMITH, YISLEIDY D. MINAYA-VARGAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fifield v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00580
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilson Fifield, Jr.
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BORZUMATI v. WILSON et al
as 2:2017cv04693
Plaintiff:
LAURIE BORZUMATI
Defendant:
ROBERT WILSON , ANDREW KLINE and SPRING CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. STANEK et al
as 2:2014cv01415
Plaintiff:
BRANDON THOMAS
Defendant:
DANIEL STANEK , LUPPINO CHRISTOPHER , DAN RUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER et al v. FOCUS FIBER SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2014cv01681
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ALEXANDER , CHAD ALLRED , CHARLES BILLS and others
Defendant:
FOCUS FIBER SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., BEACON ENTERPRISE GROUP, INC., CMK RESOURCE GROUP L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MORRIS v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON MORRIS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
POTTS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2013cv05164
Plaintiff:
JIMMY POTTS
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN , RON PHILLIPS , WALTER REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
