Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Robert Bondick v. Cambridge Real Estate Services, et al
as 22-35689
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BONDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMBRIDGE REAL ESTATE SERVICES, HOMES FOR GOOD HOUSING AGENCY, ROBIN SPENCER, Apartment Manager for Carbridge Real Estate Services and others
Bondick v. Cambridge Real Estate Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Robert Bondick
Defendant:
Cambridge Real Estate Services, Homes For Good, Robin Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Bondick v. Cambridge Real Estate Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04061
Plaintiff:
Robert S Bondick and Robert Bondick
Defendant:
Cambridge Real Estate Services, Inc., Homes For Good, Robin Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Robert Bondick v. Viriam Khalsa, et al
as 21-35410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BONDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
HOMES FOR GOOD HOUSING AGENCY, VIRIAM K. KHALSA, Hearings Officer (Homes for Good Housing), JACOB FOX, Executive Director of Homes for Good and others
Defendant:
THOMSON LANDSCAPE COMPANY, Landscape Company, CAMBRIDGE REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Property Management of Greenleaf Apartments and ROBIN SPENCER, Apartment Manager for Carbridge Real Estate Services
Robert Bondick v. Viriam Khalsa, et al
as 20-35698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BONDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
HOMES FOR GOOD HOUSING AGENCY, VIRIAM K. KHALSA, Hearings Officer (Homes for Good Housing), JACOB FOX, Executive Director of Homes for Good and others
Defendant:
THOMSON LANDSCAPE COMPANY, Landscape Company, CAMBRIDGE REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Property Management of Greenleaf Apartments and ROBIN SPENCER, Apartment Manager for Carbridge Real Estate Services
Bondick v. Khalsa et al
as 6:2018cv02122
Defendant:
Home for Good Housing, Robin Spencer, Thomson Landscape Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bondick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
