Cases 21 - 30 of 39
ROBISON v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01915
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
DORA D. ROBISON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Broaddus v. Pyle et al
as 1:2014cv01299
Plaintiff:
Shawn E Broaddus
Defendant:
. Pyle, . Leipold, Kent Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Hansen et al
as 3:2014cv00841
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
Sharon Hansen, Salvador Godinez, Jesse Mortgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
ROBISON v. KNIGHT
as 2:2014cv00130
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
MELVIN ROBISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Carpenter et al
as 1:2014cv01059
Plaintiff:
Eric Keith McKinney
Defendant:
. Carpenter, . Abernathy, . Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JESSEE v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv00064
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL, CLINTON BENNETT, JUSTIN BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE F. JESSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reeves et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00675
Plaintiff:
Charles Reeves , Ruby Reeves , William B. Reeves and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hicks v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00989
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hicks
Defendant:
Barry Clark, Sonia Arvanitis, Edward Boswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
