Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MURPHY v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, SAM PAGE, OFFICER LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL NELSON
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, Magistrate Carter, SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Symmes v. NC Unemployment Office
as 5:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Symmes, Jr.
Defendant:
NC Unemployment Office and NC Work Career Center of Rockingham County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
KALAI MAXWELL
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAIRSTON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv00300
Respondent:
SHERIFF SAM S. PAGE, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Petitioner:
BRENT DEANGELO HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NEAL v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2020cv00503
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY GOVERNMENT, A. MOSQUEDA, JOHN FIGUEROA and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00409
Defendant:
MELISSA KANEKO, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY GOVERNMENT, EMILY PULLIAM and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2019cv00397
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD MITCHELL
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2019cv00304
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD MITCHELL
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TODD v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2017cv00714
Plaintiff:
JOHN KELLY TODD
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
