Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell
Lee v. Warden of SCI-Greene et al
as 1:2021cv01909
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Greene and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brittenham v. Stevenson et al
as 2:2020cv00278
Defendant:
Tammy Wilson, Garrett Stevenson and LaFaye Kirkland
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lee Brittenham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77514
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODERICK LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONKLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13485
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODERICK LEE CONKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. CLARK et al
as 1:2019cv00353
Defendant:
Ms. HERMIT, Lt. SKINNER, JOHN/JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
RODERICK LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brittenham v. Thompson et al
as 2:2019cv00211
Defendant:
Chad Rehse, Michal S Spielbauer, Esbardo Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lee Brittenham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brittenham v. Thompson et al
as 2:2019cv00199
Defendant:
Michael S Spielbauer, Esbardo Cruz, Chad A Rehse and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lee Brittenham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brittenham v. Collier
as 1:2019cv00766
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee Brittenham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02056
Plaintiff:
Latasha Allen , Leola Atkins , Albert Bailey and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc , USP Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
