Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Harris v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
Smiley James Harris
Defendant:
Rodney Mitchell and Vincent Monreal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2011cv00018
Petitioner:
Rodney Mitchell Lundy
Respondent:
Alabama Dept. of Corrections and J. C. Giles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garzoli v. Lake County et al
as 1:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
David Garzoli
Defendant:
Lake County , Lake County Board of Supervisors and Rodney Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Patten v. County of Lake, et al
as 10-17932
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON MCCORD PATTEN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF RODNEY MITCHELL, CARLA HOCKET, Deputy Sheriff, JOE DUTRA, Deputy Sheriff and others
Jason Patten v. County of Lake, et al
as 10-17512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON MCCORD PATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LAKE, SHERIFF RODNEY MITCHELL, CARLA HOCKET, Deputy Sheriff and others
Clemons v. Mitchel et al
as 3:2010cv03832
Plaintiff:
John L. Clemons
Defendant:
Rodney Mitchel, James Bauman, Wichlaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Brown v. David Griffet, et al
as 10-2458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES J. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID GRIFFET, THOMAS PETRILLI, DENNIS BALTZELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mitchell v. Conway
as 6:2010cv06155
Petitioner:
Rodney Mitchell
Respondent:
James T. Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason Patten v. County of Lake, et al
as 09-17397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON MCCORD PATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LAKE, SHERIFF RODNEY MITCHELL, SHERIFF DETECTIVE COREY PAULICK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
