Cases 1 - 10 of 23
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02430
Plaintiff:
RODOLFO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10458
Plaintiff:
RODOLFO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2019cv00511
Respondent:
State of New Mexico and Hector Balderas
Petitioner:
Irvin Rodolfo Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez et al v. Texas Farmers Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Marisa Ramirez and Rodolfo Ramirez
Defendant:
Texas Farmers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Rodolfo Ramirez, Jr. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv09174
Defendant:
Does and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Ramirez, Jr.
Ramirez v. Tafoya-Lucero, et al.
as 2:2017cv00579
Petitioner:
Irvin Rodolfo Ramirez
Respondent:
Alisha Tafoya-Lucero and Attorney General State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Rodolfo Ramirez and El Sabor De Cuba LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Sharp, et al v. CGG Land (U.S.)
as 15-5113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. DANE SHARP, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, MARIANO ESPINOZA, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CGG LAND (U.S.) INC.
Sharp, et al v. CGG Land (U.S.)
as 15-5113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. DANE SHARP, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, MARIANO ESPINOZA, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CGG LAND (U.S.) INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
