Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rodolfo Rivera-Flores, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60315
Petitioner:
RONALD RONEY RIVERA-REYES, MARIA LUCRECIA REYES-OVIEDO, RODOLFO RIVERA-FLORES and others
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivera v. City of Port Lavaca, Calhoun County, Texas et al
as 6:2019cv00095
Defendant:
Jay Pena, City of Port Lavaca, Calhoun County, Texas and Cheyenne Beaver
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Munoz v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2016mc00036
Respondent:
Rudy DeLaCruz, Juan Tejeda, The City of San Antonio and others
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Rivera Munoz
Acevedo et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01643
Plaintiff:
Marvin Acevedo , Mario Alvarado , Theodolph Franfell Augusta and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP p.l.c.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-50145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Munoz v. The State Bar of Texas et al
as 5:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Rivera Munoz
Defendant:
The City of San Antonio, Texas and The State Bar of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodolfo Munoz v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.
as 09-50446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODOLFO RIVERA MUNOZ
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. XPRESS, INC.
Munoz v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv00210
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Rivera Munoz
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. and U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodolfo-Rivera v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00020
Petitioner:
Luis Rodolfo-Rivera
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
