Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Centro de Contacto Avanzado S.A. de C.V. v. Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. et al
as 1:2022cv00151
Plaintiff: Centro de Contacto Avanzado S.A. de C.V.
Defendant: Grupo Televisa, S.A.B., Transtelco Holdings, Inc., Transtelco, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jasso et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00858
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Katherine Darrall and Jose Rico
Plaintiff: JAMA Investment Group, Inc., Sylvia Martinez Salinas, Bernardo Villacecias and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Urena v. Fernandez et al
as 7:2019cv00055
Defendant: Rodrigo Fernandez and Barcasa Transportes De Hidrocarburos SA DE CV DBA Barcasa Reynosa
Plaintiff: Hailey Renee Urena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patterson v. City of New York
as 18-722
Plaintiff - Appellant: Taj Patterson
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, Police Officer Rodrigo Fernandez, Sergeant Ivan Furda and others
Defendant: John Doe, #1-10
Patterson v. City of New York
as 17-2586
Plaintiff - Appellant: Taj Patterson
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, Police Officer Rodrigo Fernandez, Sergeant Ivan Furda and others
Defendant: Williamsburg Safety Patrol, Inc., Shmira Volunteer Patrol Corp., Abraham Winkler and others
Rodrigo-Fernandez v. Seaborne Puerto Rico, LLC
as 3:2017cv01257
Plaintiff: Jose Ignacio Rodrigo-Fernandez
Defendant: Seaborne Puerto Rico, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03525
Defendant: Pinchas Braver, City of New York, Police Officer Rodrigo Fernandez and others
Plaintiff: Taj Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv06468
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", customerfirst2015, to-the-better and others
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Rodrigo-Fernandez v. Spain
as 14-2336
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSE IGNACIO RODRIGO-FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee: SPAIN
Rodrigo-Fernandez v. Spain We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01911
Plaintiff: Jose Ignacio Rodrigo-Fernandez
Defendant: Spain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?