Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rodriguez v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Pedro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden William Reubart, Aaron D. Ford and Warden William Gittere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfonso Rodriguez, Jr. v. United States
as 22-1559
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alfonso Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Alfonso Rodriguez, Jr. v. United States
as 22-1461
Petitioner:
Alfonso Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Rosendo Rodriguez, III v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-70010
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROSENDO RODRIGUEZ, III
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ruben Ramirez v. Steve McCraw, et al
as 17-70028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN CARDENAS RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE MCCRAW, Director, Texas Department of Public Safety, RICARDO RODRIGUEZ, JR., District Attorney, Hidalgo County, JOE MARCHAN, Regional Crime Lab Manager, Weslaco DPS Laboratory and others
Cuesta-Rodriguez v. Royal
as 16-6315
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Rosendo Rodriguez, III v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-70020
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROSENDO RODRIGUEZ, III
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Juan Rodriguez v. Secretary, FL DOC
as 16-11258
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Rodriguez v. Stephens
as 5:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
Rosendo Rodriguez, III
Defendant:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Rodriguez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2013cv24567
Plaintiff:
Juan David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
