Cases 51 - 60 of 8,163
Dumond, Daniel v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv21232
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
L. Rodriguez and Miami Dade Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ VARGAS v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv04449
Plaintiff:
RICARDO RODRIGUEZ VARGAS
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and T. HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobes v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hobes
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, Superintendent Edward Burnett, Kevin Fierro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00862
Petitioner:
Nicolas Rodriguez
Respondent:
J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Candella v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Daniel Candella
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irizarry v. Rodriguez
as 3:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Irizarry
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Rodriguez
as 3:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Gary Gray
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alatan v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Olotin Alfred Alatan
Defendant:
United States of America, Gus Saper and Lourdes Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rodriguez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Amauri Rodriguez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
