Cases 41 - 50 of 293
BROWN v. VALSUKA et al
as 2:2015cv01439
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
KRISTIN VALSUKA, CYNTHIA MCSWIGGIN, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RILEY v. N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2015cv07186
Plaintiff:
GEORGE C. RILEY
Defendant:
N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD, JAMES PLOUSIS, EDWARD JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUIZ v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv03304
Plaintiff:
MARIANITO RUIZ
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , MCCABE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHINE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PA et al
as 2:2015cv02354
Plaintiff:
BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESTATE OF JOSHUA DIALLO JONES et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2014cv05095
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOSHUA DIALLO JONES and JANICE JACKSON
Defendant:
ANGEL SANTIAGO, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICER 1-10, JANE ROE SUPERVISOR 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARSONS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv01556
Plaintiff:
RANDALL PARSONS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B.O.P., FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER PHILA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
NEIL v. SULAYMAN et al
as 1:2013cv06033
Plaintiff:
STEVEN NEIL
Defendant:
SAMIR SULAYMAN, M.D., ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE, M.D., JOSE RAVAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARUSO v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2013cv05837
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CARUSO
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, CHARLES ALBINO, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
