Cases 31 - 40 of 62
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 1:2017cv02590
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00768
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv04184
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Soo Song, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Sean Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 3:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00724
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Strack v. Rekau et al
as 2:2017cv00834
Plaintiff:
Lara Strack
Defendant:
Katherine M Rekau, Deanna Schaub, Jennifer McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nally v. Dekalb County, Illinois et al
as 3:2017cv50078
Plaintiff:
William Nally, Jr.
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Illinois, Ronald Matekaitis, Rick Amato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childress v. Kerr et al
as 4:2017cv04073
Plaintiff:
Craig A Childress
Defendant:
Ryan Kerr, Joshua Clevinger, Travis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Jensen et al
as 3:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis, Jr, Renda Nicolas and KD
Defendant:
Mr Jensen, Troy W Akers, Terrance Roe and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gdowik v. Hardy et al
as 1:2016cv10463
Plaintiff:
Conrad Gdowik
Defendant:
Daniel Hardy, Jeff Pharis, Kareemi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
