Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Nicholson v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Molly Nicholson
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc , Does I through X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00129
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis et al v. Jensen et al
as 3:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis, Jr, Renda Nicolas and KD
Defendant:
Mr Jensen, Troy W Akers, Terrance Roe and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANCINI et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2016cv02048
Plaintiff:
K. C. and MARA MANCINI
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DOES 1-50, DEBRA DOTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Restricted Filer v. Roberts et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Richard W Roberts, Henry H Kennedy, Rosemary M Collyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01696
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
MAN v. SWALLERS et al
as 1:2015cv01593
Defendant:
SARAH EVANS BARKER, BRIAN BURNETT, DAVID J. CERTO and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe v. James et al
as 2:2015cv00258
Defendant:
Marten Transport Ltd and Dean D James
Plaintiff:
Andrew Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEWSOME v. COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2014cv06015
Defendant:
APS AND COOK EUROPE FINANCE BV, CGI, CGI REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONNA NEWSOME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAMM v. FAITH et al
as 4:2014cv00123
Defendant:
JAMES BIDDLE, SEAN CLEMONS, RODNEY ENGLERT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. CAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
