Cases 61 - 70 of 96
Roe et al v. McCutcheon et al
as 4:2012cv01251
Plaintiff:
David Roe and Terry Roe
Defendant:
Willie McCutcheon and National Freight Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Forbes v. Dawsey et al
as 4:2012cv00862
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Forbes
Defendant:
Martin C Dawsey, Bellamy Law Firm, The, R Michael Munden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. McCray et al
as 4:2011cv01305
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sam J McCray, Gilbert McCray, Elsie Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
French v. Columbia, City of et al
as 3:2011cv00717
Plaintiff:
Brandon French
Defendant:
Columbia, City of , Columbia, City of Police Department , W Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lemon v. Doe et al
as 3:2010cv02758
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Lemon, Sr
Defendant:
John Doe, Richard Roe, City of Sumter Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Cannon
as 2:2010cv02236
Plaintiff:
Terrence Bowie Robinson
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Smeltzer et al
as 6:2010cv02032
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Robert Smeltzer, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Doe et al v. South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind et al
as 7:2010cv00680
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Mary Roe
Defendant:
South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind and Pamela C Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norman v. Frederick et al
as 8:2009cv02479
Plaintiff:
Rahmad N Norman
Defendant:
Michael Frederick, Dale Kittles, Christopher Hamlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Anderson, The County of et al
as 6:2009cv02368
Plaintiff:
Jerry White
Defendant:
Anderson, The County of, Anderson County Detention Center, Garry Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
