Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer E Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Spivak v. Alphabet Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01480
Plaintiff:
Rivka Spivak and Rebecca Spivak
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc, Does 1-X, FaceBook Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Block v. Washington State Bar Association et al
as 2:2018cv00907
Plaintiff:
Anne K Block
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association , Kevin Bank, Linda Eide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Seatree PLLC et al
as 2:2017cv01623
Defendant:
Seatree PLLC and James J Namiki
Plaintiff:
Janet Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sampaga v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2016cv01310
Defendant:
Snohomish County , Mark Roe , The City of Everett and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Sampaga
Counter_claimant:
Mark Roe and Snohomish County
Counter_defendant:
Jason Sampaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv01309
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Mark Roe, The City of Everett and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Sampaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2015cv01335
Defendant:
Snohomish County and Mark Roe
Plaintiff:
Patrick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gamache v. Bylsma et al
as 3:2015cv05154
Plaintiff:
Christine Gamache
Defendant:
Edward Bylsma, Robin Yakhour, Craig Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roe 1 et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2014cv05810
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe 1 , Jane Roe 2 and Dreamgirls of Tacoma LLC
Defendant:
Julie Anderson , Pierce County and David Van Vleet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
