Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wallace v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Roger Wallace
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Henderson v. Reitmeyer et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Abel Alvarado, FNU LNU, Celeb Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Wallace Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Davis et al
as 1:2019cv01242
Defendant:
State of Texas and Lorie Davis
Plaintiff:
Roger Wallace Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Davis
as 1:2016cv01044
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Roger Wallace Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roger Henderson v. Terry Pickering, et al
as 16-50889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER WALLACE HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY PICKERING, Bastrop County Sheriff, DEBIT CARD COMPANY and MONEY DEPOSIT VENDING MACHINE COMPANY
Henderson v. Pickering et al
as 1:2016cv00618
Defendant:
Debit Card Company, Money Deposit Vending Machine Company and Terry Pickering
Plaintiff:
Roger Wallace Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Davis
as 1:2016cv00598
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Roger Wallace Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. The State of Texas
as 1:2016cv00410
Respondent:
Bastrop County District Court, Larry Gist Unit, William Stephens and others
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Roger Wallace Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. The State of Texas
as 1:2016cv00289
Respondent:
Bastrop County District Court, Larry Gist Unit, William Stephens and others
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Roger Wallace Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
