Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Gresham v. Rohan et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
James Gresham
Defendant:
Officer Rohan, Officer Triffio and City of Marion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Cooper et al
as 7:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Tevin Edward Davis
Defendant:
Sgt. L. Cooper, Capt. Baitert, Capt. Jonathan Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 4:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv05070
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Decker et al
as 1:2022cv09692
Petitioner:
Anthony Rohan O"ne Blake and Anthony Rohan O'Neil Blake
Defendant:
Thomas R. Decker, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick Garland
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Burton v. Rohan et al
as 2:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Daymeyan Burton
Defendant:
C/O Rohan, William Hutchings, J. Scally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2020cv00780
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Justin Marzec, Derek Jappe and others
Plaintiff:
Earl H Bond, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hankerson v. Royce
as 1:2020cv00282
Respondent:
Mark Royce
Petitioner:
Rohan Hankerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vidal et al v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2019cv01578
Defendant:
Rowe, Poupard, Sheriff Joe Lombardo and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Scharas, Khloe Ann Vidal, James Neske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Bean et al
as 2:2019cv01021
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
C/O Rohan and AW Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
