Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00488
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Kumar
as 23-3719
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ROHIT KUMAR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06061
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
KUMAR v. ATTORNEY GENERAL USA
as 1:2023cv01314
Plaintiff: ROHIT KUMAR
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL USA and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01929
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01980
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01625
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01355
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01081
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rohit Kumar v. William Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2493
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rohit Kumar
Defendant / Appellee: William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States (Matthew G. Whittaker named on original complaint), Jessie K. Liu and Joseph P. Kelly

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?