Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cheryl Davis et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2025cv09363
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Davis, Khalilah Mckinney, Pamela Taylor and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Davis et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2025cv01063
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Davis, Khalilah Mckinney, Pamela Taylor and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Castle et al v. AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv11383
Plaintiff:
Scott Castle, Manuel Castorena, Jr., Felipe Castro and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hilario Castro-Nava v. Pamela Bondi
as 25-1339
Petitioner:
HILARIO ROMAN CASTRO-NAVA
Respondent:
PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General of the United States
CASTRO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv86595
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROMAN CASTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASTRO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv44611
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROMAN CASTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castro et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2018at01268
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Roman Castro , Rodney Castro , Castro Rodney and others
Defendant:
State of California, Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Deuel Vocational Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jose Castro
as 16-5354
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ROMAN CASTRO
USA v. Roman Castro
as 13-3900
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROMAN CASTRO
Roman-Castro v Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv01836
Plaintiff:
IIeana Roman-Castro
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
