Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Aguilera Diaz et al v. Svihel et al
as 0:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
Allan Juseth Aguilera Diaz, Nahun Alexander Barahona Amador, Jerson Ariel Betanco Flores and others
Defendant:
John J. Svihel and Svihel Vegetable Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Civil Remedies: Human Trafficking
Rodriguez-Romero v. Williams
as 6:2023cv03310
Petitioner:
Raul Rodriguez-Romero
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Palomares v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
as 4:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Domingo Romero Palomares
Defendant:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Romero v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv02443
Plaintiff:
Diana Romero
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Romero v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01969
Plaintiff:
Jerry Romero
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Rigoberto Flores-Romero v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1082
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Flores-Romero
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Romero v. Selene Finance, LP et al
as 4:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
Valerie A. Vance Romero
Defendant:
Selene Finance, LP, US Bank Trust National Association, RCF 2 Acquisition Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Romero v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Ali Romero
Defendant:
USA and Does Warden of FCI Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
