Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lopez v. Homan et al
as 3:2019cv00098
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, Timothy E. Filson and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Homan et al
as 2:2019cv00314
Defendant:
Stephen F. Sisolak, William A. Gittere, Timothy E. Filson and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omar Cash v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 14-4222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR SHERIEFF CASH
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, CHIEF GRIEVANCE OFFICER, SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI and others
HASKINS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ALLEN HASKINS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Carrasquillo v. Sec of PA Dept Corr, et al
as 13-2373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE CARRASQUILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Secretary of Correction, Central Office CampHill, MICHAEL HARLOW, Acting Superintendent SCI Albion, RONALD J. BRYANT, Deputy Superintendent SCI Albion and others
PATRICK v. ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 1:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
JAMES PATRICK
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JACK DANERI, ERNEST J. DISANTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARRASQUILLO v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
JOSE CARRASQUILLO
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL W. HARLOW, RONALD J. BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
DION PATRICK LEE, III
Defendant:
RONALD J. BRYANT, WILLIAM J. WOODS, ROBERT K. SUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. HARLOW et al
as 1:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS E. CARTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW, RICHARD M. HALL, RONALD J. BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
