Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Smith, et al. v. Tumalo Irrigation District, et al.
as 24-70
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES SMITH, PAUL CALLEN, KATHY POWELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT, RONALD ALVARADO, in his official capacity as State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Save Arnold Canal v. Arnold Irrigation District et al
as 6:2022cv01462
Plaintiff:
Save Arnold Canal
Defendant:
Arnold Irrigation District, Ronald Alvarado and Natural Resources Conservation Service
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Matthew Smith, et al v. Tumalo Irrigation District, et al
as 20-36057
Appellant:
ANN CORKERY, KEVIN CORKERY, PAUL CALLEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD ALVARADO, in his official capacity as State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Counter Claimant:
TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Smith et al v. Tumalo Irrigation District et al
as 6:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Ronald Alvarado, Tumalo Irrigation District and Natural Resources Conservation Service
Plaintiff:
Paul Callen and Matt James Smith
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706
Ronald Alvarado v. People of California
as 2:2014cv08448
Petitioner:
Ronald Alvarado
Respondent:
People of California
Alvarado et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20953
Plaintiff:
Nilda Alvarado and Ronald Alvarado, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarado v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2014cv00370
Petitioner:
Ronald Alvarado
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
