Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Timothy King v. Erik Hooks
as 21-6561
Plaintiff:
XAVIER KINNEY, MICHAEL BLANKEY, TIMOTHY BOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH LASSITER, MELANIE SHELTON, CYNTHIA THORNTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY ROYAL KING
King et al v. Perry et al
as 5:2017ct03043
Plaintiff:
Timothy Royal King, Michael Blakney, Derick White and others
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, W. David Guice, Cynthia Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair, Jr. v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00307
Plaintiff:
Ronald Blair, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Winstead v. Vaughan
as 5:2014hc02235
Petitioner:
Ronald Blair Winstead
Respondent:
James Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In Re: Merrill Lynch & Co., et al v. , et al
as 1:2002md01484
Lead Plaintiff:
John Kilgour Lentell, Arash Saffarnia, Steven Roth and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Conte, Rosalae Sasson, Robert Griffin and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Shubhro Sen, Mary Sen, Joan Markowitz and others
Petitioner:
E. Powell Miller, Lowell Strate, Georgiana Strate and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., Henry Blodget, Merrill Lynch Internet Strategies Fund, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Susan Lockshine and Gary Bauer
Consolidated Defendant:
Princeton Funds Distributor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re: Merrill Lynch & Co., et al v. , et al
as 1:2021mc00096
Plaintiff:
Jerry Conte, Rosalae Sasson, Robert Griffin and others
Petitioner:
E. Powell Miller, Lowell Strate, Georgiana Strate and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., Henry Blodget, Merrill Lynch Internet Strategies Fund, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
