Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ronald Knight v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13523
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD KNIGHT
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Knight v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2022cv80626
Plaintiff:
Ronald Knight
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Knight v. Florida Department of Corr., et al
as 18-12488
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD KNIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Knight v. Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 9:2017cv81159
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and State of Florida Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Ronald Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Sam Wallace
as 16-6821
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAM QUINTON WALLACE, a/k/a Gugang, a/k/a Ronald Knight
Ronald Knight v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 16-10079
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD KNIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF FLORIDA
Ellis v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv05420
Plaintiff:
Jamal J Ellis
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Don Holbrook, John Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Sinclair et al
as 3:2015cv05225
Plaintiff:
Jimi James Hamilton
Defendant:
Steven Sinclair , Fallon Hughes , Tim Birley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troupe v. Pease et al
as 4:2015cv05021
Plaintiff:
David Troupe
Defendant:
Charles W Pease, Ronald Knight, Christopher Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sinclair et al
as 4:2015cv05016
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Sinclair, Christopher Bowman, Ronald Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
