Cases 1 - 9 of 9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. HORNING INVESTMENTS, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00830
Defendant:
HORNING INVESTMENTS, LLC and RONALD PHELPS, II
Relator:
SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 20
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Phelps v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 0:2013cv01821
Plaintiff:
Dolores Phelps and Ronald Phelps
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corporation
Phelps v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as MN/0:13-cv-01821
Plaintiff:
Dolores Phelps and Ronald Phelps
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp.
Phelps v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as LAW/2:13-cv-01629
Plaintiff:
Dolores Phelps and Ronald Phelps
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Stryker Corp.
Phelps v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 2:2013cv01629
Plaintiff:
Dolores Phelps and Ronald Phelps
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Stryker Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DONOHOE v. HORNING INVESTMENTS, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00928
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. DONOHOE
Defendant:
HORNING INVESTMENTS, LLC, RONALD PHELPS, II and KENNETH M. YALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Evans et al v. Electrolux Home Products et al
as 4:2007cv01782
Plaintiff:
Daniel Evans, Deborah Evans and Judith Phelps
Defendant:
Ronald Phelps, Electrolux Home Products and Beiters Home Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phelps v. CMF Truss, Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv00902
Plaintiff:
Ronald Phelps and Ronald Phelps
Defendant:
CMF Truss, Inc., Southeast Employee Leasing, Inc., Southeast Employee Leasing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
