Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Emrit v. Combs
as 24-40247
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean Combs, also known as P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Emrit v. Combs, et al.
as 4:2024cv00201
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
P Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Emrit v. Pratt
as 23-30204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Kara Pratt, Attorney of Hillsboro Texas, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 4:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 2:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 6:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 6:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
