Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Glasgow et al v. Beers et al
as 5:2021cv02001
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Glasgow, William Rooker, Donna Landry and others
Defendant:
Ronald Beers, Daniel J Beers, Daniel Beers and others
Ivanoff v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00896
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., CL Products International, LLC, Luminex Home Decor and Fragrance Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Ivanoff, Brandon Bulger, Scott T. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avery v. Wooten et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Gary Sneed, Lisa Cooke, David Dobbins and others
Plaintiff:
David Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Rooker v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Rooker
Defendant:
Joel Jenkins, Timothy Dickerson, Pike County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevier v. Haslam et al
as 3:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier
Defendant:
William Edward (Bill) Haslam, Herbert H. Slatery, III, Megan Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Noreeldeen Abdulkarim v. TN, et al
as 15-6139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NOREELDEEN ABDULKARIM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTE WATKINS, ELAINE HEARD and others
Abdulkarim v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00926
Plaintiff:
Noreeldeen Abdulkarim
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Monte Watkins, Elaine Heard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
