Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Barnes v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2010cv01471
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Barnes, Jr.
Garnishee: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Barnes v. Adams et al
as 3:2010xc01468
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Barnes, Jr.
Defendant: Flozell Adams
Garnishee: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Flozell Adams v. Roosevelt Barnes, Jr.
as 10-10739
Plaintiff - Appellant: FLOZELL ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee: ROOSEVELT BARNES, JR.
Adams
as 3:2009xc01858
Petitioner: Flozell J. Adams
Amicu: Roosevelt Barnes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Type: Contract None
Adams et al v. Barnes
as 3:2009xc01859
Petitioner: Flozell J. Adams and Flozell J. Adams
Defendant: Roosevelt Barnes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Type: Contract None
Flozell Adams v. Roosevelt Barnes, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01860
Plaintiff: Flozell Adams
Defendant: Roosevelt Barnes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Type: Contract None
Barnes v. Bates et al
as 3:2009cv00562
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Barnes
Defendant: Dee Bates, Roger Graves and Robert Lenior
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2009cv00561
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Barnes
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. King We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00363
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Barnes
Defendant: Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Director TDCJ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2009cv00068
Petitioner: Roosevelt Barnes, Jr
Respondent: Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?