Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Rosario-Colon v. Vannoy
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Walter Rosario-Colon
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosario v. Brown
as 4:2023cv04279
Plaintiff:
Geraldo D. Rosario
Defendant:
Officer Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Paul E Neal
Defendant:
A Oliver, K Rosario, D Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosario v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Juan Rafael Rosario
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv02877
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ortiz
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Moises Villalobos, Jr., Dana C. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosario v. Lumpkin
as 3:2022cv00241
Petitioner:
Juan Rafael Rosario
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Sr. Warden Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosario v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02382
Petitioner:
Juan Rafael Rosario
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valero v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv02272
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Valero
Defendant:
Brian Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Moises Villalobos, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Orosco
as 22-40384
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Del Rasario Orosco, also known as Maria Del Rosario Orozco, also known as Fluve, also known as Fluje, also known as Rochi, also known as Maria
Rosario v. James et al
as 3:2021cv00340
Plaintiff:
Juan Rafael Rosario
Defendant:
Yolanda James, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, C.T. Terrell Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
