Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Chambers v. Erskine et al
as 4:2019cv00408
Defendant:
Mayberry, Erslhine, Muella and others
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv50331
Respondent:
Rivers and Chris Rivers
Petitioner:
Roscoe Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roscoe ChambersIn re: Roscoe Chambers
as 19-3832
Respondent:
MARK INCH, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Not Yet Classified:
ALAN N. BLOCH
Petitioner:
In re: ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Chambers v. Mayberry et al
as 3:2019cv50319
Defendant:
Lt. Muella, Lt. Erskine, Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roscoe Chambers v. Ebbert, et al
as 19-3394
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MOYER, WARDEN DAVID EBBERT, CERNEY, DHO Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Roscoe Chambers v. Ebbert, et al
as 19-3395
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. GONSAR, A. SCOTT, DAVID EBBERT, Warden and others
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DILTZ, COUNSELOR GONSAR, COUNSELOR A. SCOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Chambers v. Healy
as 3:2019cv50266
Petitioner:
Roscoe Chambers
Respondent:
R. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roscoe Chambers v. Michael Horowitz, et al
as 19-5250
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector General and William M. Biler, Deputy Inspector General
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roscoe Chambers
Roscoe Chambers v. C. Herrera, et al
as 19-56114
Defendant / Appellee:
D. MILLER, in his individual capacity, A. MARTIN, S.I. Officer in his individual capacity, E. PEREZ and others
Defendant:
STEVEN LAKE, M. MITCHELL, Western Regional Director, official capacity, CLARK, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Roscoe Chambers v. Ebbert, et al
as 19-3135
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MOYER, WARDEN DAVID EBBERT, CERNEY, DHO Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
