Cases 1 - 10 of 300
PARKS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PARKS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, DEPUTY WARDEN BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. MAHON et al
as 2:2024cv02159
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RENEE MAHON, JEFF DAVIDSON, JESSICA WROBLEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. FRANKFORD AVENUE RITE AID et al
as 2:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
FRANKFORD AVENUE RITE AID, DUNKIN DONUTS, WAWA FRANKFORD AVENUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEARD v. HCF OF FAIRVIEW, INC.
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
ROSE L. BEARD
Defendant:
HCF OF FAIRVIEW, INC. doing business as FAIRVIEW MANOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose McAvoy v. Dickinson College
as 23-2939
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSE MCAVOY
Defendant / Appellee:
DICKINSON COLLEGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
GOOLD et al v. OPERA et al
as 2:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ANN GOOLD and BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
DANIEL OPERA, MARY ROSE OPERA, UPPER SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kuntz v. McPherson
as 4:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
Lance Christian Kuntz
Defendant:
Tom Rose McPherson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
