Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Rose v. Koch et al
as 6:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Tevian Rose
Defendant:
Kelli Koch and LPL Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rose v. Kenneth J. Rose Irrevocable Trust et al
as 6:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Larry Alan Rose
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Rose Irrevocable Trust, Dorothy M. Rose, Kenneth Gary Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scism v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Catherine Rose Scism
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Prestel v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Prestel
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County of Mcintosh, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prestel v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Prestel
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County of Mcintosh, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley et al v. Wagoner, City of et al
as 6:2020cv00248
Plaintiff:
Elisha Edward Kelley and Helen Raye Kelley
Defendant:
Buddy Rose, Wagoner, City of and Wagoner Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Myers v. USA
as 6:2019cv00348
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rose Maria Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rose v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00301
Plaintiff:
Delisa Rose
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bell et al v. Smith et al
as 6:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Sylvanius Bell, Ruth Bell and Angelia Bell
Defendant:
Robert Smith, Kevin Cowen, Kenneth Cowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
