Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Moumouni v. Chester County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Rose Moumouni and Rose B. Moumouni
Defendant:
Chester County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Griffin v. Stonebreaker et al
as 1:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
Gary Jason Griffin
Defendant:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker, Jr, Associate Warden Gause, Associate Warden Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Ward v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ward
Defendant:
Director Rose, J Reuben Long Medical Staff and Medical of J. Reuben Long Detention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Al-Haqq v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Ms. June Smith, Nurse Harrigan, Nurse Bonnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. Stirling
as 0:2023cv05261
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Defendant:
Brian Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. Jefferson
as 2:2023cv02132
Plaintiff:
James Edward Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Deadra L. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. McCormick Correctional Institution
as 0:2023cv01532
Petitioner:
James R. Rose
Respondent:
McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Palmer et al
as 5:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Terrell Nelson
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer, A/W Yolanda Turner, A/W Thomas Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough L.L.P.
as 2:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Defendant:
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. Palmer
as 0:2023cv01022
Petitioner:
James R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
