Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Redmond et al v. Hertz et al
as 2:2023cv12164
Plaintiff:
Josiah Redmond, Jayla Redmond, Gerald Redmond and others
Defendant:
Timothy Hertz, Macomb Towing, LLC, Michael Angeleri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robles et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv11456
Plaintiff:
Laura Robles and Frank Vincent Robles, III
Defendant:
Chad Lee and Roseville, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blunt v. Roseville, City of et al
as 2:2023cv11459
Plaintiff:
Kelly Amber Blunt
Defendant:
City of Roseville, jason otto, Bridget Lines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Terrell v. Roseville, City of et al
as 2:2018cv13724
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Terrell
Defendant:
Roseville, City of and Frank Dotsie
Christenson et al v. Osterhout et al
as 2:2018cv11152
Plaintiff:
James Christenson and Christenson Law Trust
Defendant:
James Osterhout and Roseville, City of
Cordia Michigan, LLC et al v. Roseville, City of et al
as 2:2016cv10986
Plaintiff:
Cordia Michigan, LLC , Garner Properties & Management and Rudalev, LLC
Defendant:
Roseville, City of and Glenn Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garner et al v. Roseville, City of et al
as 2:2016cv10760
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Garner , Christopher Garner and William Kaupus
Defendant:
Roseville, City of, Glenn Sexton, Rodney Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christenson et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2015cv14441
Plaintiff:
James Christenson and Christenson Law Trust
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Roseville, City of, James Osterhout and others
JC et al v. Roseville City of et al
as 2:2015cv13301
Defendant:
Roseville City of and Thomas Pfeifer
Plaintiff:
JC and Nancy Crampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Roseville, City of et al
as 2:2014cv11252
Plaintiff:
Dwayne L Dye
Defendant:
Roseville, City of, James P Berlin and Witherspoon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
