Cases 1 - 10 of 117
THEODORE v. PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024mc00011
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. THEODORE
Defendant:
PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MICHAEL OTWORTH, MICHAEL E. DEE and others
Respondent:
HINDENBURG RESEARCH, LLC
CARDWELL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, SHANE DADY, SERGEANT CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUST v. ROTH et al
as 5:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER YOUST
Defendant:
BRUCE ROTH, HONORABLE JUDGE MERRILL M. SPAHN, JR., DETECTIVE CHRIS DISSINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIROS v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE BIROS
Defendant:
SHANNI SNYDER, GEORGE SNYDER, KASH SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ROTH v. MRAVINTZ
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ROTH
Defendant:
SERGEANT JOHN MRAVINTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CARR v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv03605
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. CARR
Defendant:
PAUL GREGORY LITTLE, TIMMOTHY KROSS, ALICIA ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
ROTH v. KUCKER et al
as 5:2022cv02047
Plaintiff:
JASON ROTH
Defendant:
KEN KUCKER and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROTH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv01503
Plaintiff:
KYLE JAMES ROTH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Roth v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Rochelle L. Roth
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
