Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31856
Plaintiff: ROY DIXON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mason v. Soto et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff: Edward Mason
Defendant: C. Soto, Roy Dixon, Barbara Gruber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEDQUEST, LTD v. TRIVENT SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06893
Petitioner: MEDQUEST, LTD
Respondent: TRIVENT SYSTEMS, INC., TRIVENT SYSTEMS PVT, LTD, SENGUTTUVAN SAM SHANMUGAM and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Nance v. Dixon et al
as 2:2022cv00423
Plaintiff: Reo Thomas Nance
Defendant: Roy Dixon, Mercado, S. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84150
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: ROY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. USA
as 2:2016cv13901
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Roy Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Roy Dixon
as 15-2239
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ROY DIXON
Rose et al v. Computer Sciences Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00813
Plaintiff: Steve Rose , Kenneth Alford , Paul Beavers and others
Defendant: Computer Sciences Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2014cv81056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SEC v. Onyx Capital Advisors, LLC, et al
as 14-1396
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: ONYX CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC
Defendant - Appellant: ROY DIXON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL A FARR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?