Cases 1 - 10 of 10
NaKisha Jackson v. Roy Brun, et al
as 19-30828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAKISHA JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY L. BRUN, Judge, MIKE SPENCE, Caddo Parish Clerk of Court, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Jackson v. Brun et al
as 5:2019cv01006
Plaintiff:
NaKisha Jackson
Defendant:
Mike Spence, Roy L Brun, 1st Judicial District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank McCall, Jr. v. Roy Brun, et al
as 15-30467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK L. MCCALL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY L. BRUN, RAMON LAFITTE, JENNIFER CLASON and others
McCall v. Brun et al
as 1:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
Roy L Brun, Ramon Lafitte, Jennifer Clason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake v. Rogers, et al
as 08-30824
Plaintiff-Counter Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC VON DRAKE
Defendant-Counter Claimant - Appellee:
EDGAR LYNN ROGERS and ANGELA ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LOFTIN, ROY L BRUN, CHARLES R SCOTT and others
Drake v. Rogers et al
as 5:2008cv00124
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Edgar Lynn Rogers, Angela Rogers, Gary Loftin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCall v. Caddo et al
as 5:2008cv00070
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
Parish of Caddo, City of Shreveport, Patricia A Shacklette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Edgar Lynn Rogers, Angela Rogers, Gary Loftin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Rogers et al
as 6:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
Eric Von Drake
Defendant:
Edgar Lynn Rogers, Angela Rogers, Gary Loftin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McCall v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2007cv00516
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, Parish of Caddo, Jeffery P Victory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
