Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Mason et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bruce Mason, CArlos Alberto Garcia, Theodore Michael Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Miller v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00458
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Miller
Defendant:
CO Jenkins and Lt. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Paul Transportation Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00264
Defendant:
Michael F England and Paul Transportation Inc
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Madison County Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv01166
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Madison County Alabama, Blake Dorning, Steve Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00636
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Burns
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dix v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2012cv02436
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Dix
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McAteer v. Bolling et al (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 2:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee McAteer
Defendant:
Leon Bolling , Susan Clemons and Leeposey Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAteer v. Daniels, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00630
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee McAteer
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Kim Tobias Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAteer v. McCooey (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00303
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee McAteer
Defendant:
Tracy S. McCooey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAteer v. Plainer et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00285
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee McAteer
Defendant:
Elizabeth Plainer and Lieutenant Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
