Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Anderson v. Opel et al
as 1:2023cv01597
Plaintiff:
Porsha Anderson
Defendant:
Brandon Opel, Jeff Nines, Robert Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Mills v. Beitzel et al
as 1:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Lauren A. Beitzel, April Carr, Vaughn Whiteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Rozas
as 1:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Hamilton
Defendant:
Ramon Rozas, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Carr et al
as 1:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
April Carr, Lauren A. Beitzel, Vaughn Whiteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Lauren Beitzel et al
as 1:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Lauren Beitzel, Vaughn Whiteman, Lieutenant, John G. Sindy, Case Management Specialist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin Smith v. Cpl. D. Beavers
as 22-6518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CPL D. N. BEAVERS, Corporal, CPL. UZZLE, Corporal/Intel, D. A. TAYLOR, Deputy/Intel and others
Franklin Smith v. Cpl. D. Beavers
as 20-2329
Defendant / Appellee:
J. VARGAS, Captain, D. A. TAYLOR, Deputy/Intel, CPL. DEVO, Corporal and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Franklin Smith v. Cpl. D. Beavers
as 20-6268
Defendant / Appellee:
J. VARGAS, Captain, D. A. TAYLOR, Deputy/Intel, CPL. DEVO, Corporal and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Nrekic v. Smith and Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01607
Plaintiff:
Roza Nrekic
Defendant:
Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Bearers et al
as 2:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Smith
Defendant:
Cpl. D.N. Bearers, Cpl. Uzzle, D.A. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
