Cases 1 - 10 of 100
US v. Rudolph Smith, Jr.
as 26-4462
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RUDOLPH ALFREDO SMITH, JR.
Jackson v. Rudolph
as 3:2026cv01182
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Respondent:
S. Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gartner Inc. et al v. Virk et al
as 3:2026cv01450
Plaintiff:
Gartner Inc. and Gartner Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Anmol Virk, Tyler Rudolph and International Data Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Kohute v. Contreras et al
as 5:2026cv09604
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kohute
Defendant:
Rudolph Contreras, D.C. Cultivation Center, Cannibus Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rudolph
as 3:2026cv01165
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Defendant:
S. Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. Rudolph
as 3:2026cv01164
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
S. Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. Rudolph
as 3:2026cv01156
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
S. Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sullivan v. Newsmax Media et al
as 2:2026cv00786
Plaintiff:
John Earle Sullivan
Defendant:
Newsmax Media, Christopher Ruddy, Rudolph Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Acosta et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2026cv07241
Plaintiff:
Veronica Acosta, Anthony Bianco, Thomas Carbone and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Rudolph v. Flynn Group, LP et al
as 3:2026cv08830
Plaintiff:
Michael Rudolph
Defendant:
Flynn Group, LP and Hut American Group, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
