Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rudon v. Garland
as 24-544
Petitioner:
ULIDE ANTHONY RUDON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL and CRAIG WILLIAM KUHN, TRIAL ATTORNEY
Ramsey v. Lynch, et al
as 1:2016cv00327
Petitioner:
Ramond Rudone Ramsey
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch, Bill Gray and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00154
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00086
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fred Johnson-Rudon v. USA
as 13-11429
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRED DWAYNE JOHNSON-RUDON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fred Dwayne Johnson-Rudon v. USA
as 8:2013cv00521
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Fred Dwayne Johnson-Rudon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Vargas v. State Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2012cv02207
Plaintiff:
Julio Cruz Vargas
Defendant:
State Department of Corrections, David A. Varano, Danny Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
La-Qun Williams v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 12-3611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA-QUN RASHEED WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
DAVID A. VARANO, ROBERT MCMILLAN, RONDA M. ELLETT and others
La-Qun Williams v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 12-3612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA-QUN RASHEED WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
DAVIS, STEWARDDESS ANASCAVAGE, MALLERY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
