Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Mengistu v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2041
Plaintiff:
NEWAY MENGISTU, an individual
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a State of California entity and OTHERS TO BE JOINED UNDER RULE 19 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc. v. Aztec Manufacturing, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc.
Defendant:
Aztec Manufacturing, Inc. doing business as Aztec Washer Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
UiPath Inc. v. Rule 14 LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
UiPath Inc.
Defendant:
Rule 14 LLC and SPX Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Zenaida Mojica et al v. Spark Family Operations, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Zenaida Mojica, Lydia Mojica Behrens and Fair Housing Federation of Southern California
Defendant:
Spark Family Operations, LLC, Spark Family Properties, LLC, A Better Tomorrow Care Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Boyd v. Martin et al
as 2:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Christopher Boyd and Brinkley
Defendant:
David Martin, Boycheken, Mattshid Sarrami and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
Neway Mengistu v. HACLA
as 23-55382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEWAY MENGISTU, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a State of California entity; and others to be joined under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Heagney et al v. John Paul Mitchell Systems
as 3:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Randall Heagney, Rica Guerrero, Kerrie Gonnella and others
Defendant:
John Paul Mitchell Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Alvin Hegge v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 22-36054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN HEGGE, Representative under Fed R Civ P Rule 23(a)
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY INSLEE, ROBERT FERGUSON, TODD COLEMAN and others
Signify North America Corporation et al v. Lepro Innovation Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02095
Plaintiff:
Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.
Defendant:
Lepro Innovation Inc., LE Innovation Inc., Innovation Rules Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
