Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Runnels v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Savortae Runnels
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Emily Timms, FNU Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Runnels
as 23-7036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMMIE RUNNELS, JR.
Runnels v. Whitten
as 4:2021cv00255
Petitioner:
Marcus Runnel and Marcus Runnels
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Runnels v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2021cv00244
Petitioner:
Marcus H Runnels
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1153
Runnels v. Stanley Steemer International, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02731
Plaintiff:
Lateef Runnels
Defendant:
Stanley Steemer International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Runnels v. Oklahoma County Commissioners et al
as 5:2017cv01336
Plaintiff:
Savortae Runnels
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Commissioners, PD Taylor and John Whetsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Who Subscribed to Policy No. PGIARK00201 04 v. Aminokit Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00412
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Who Subscribed to Policy No. PGIARK00201 04
Defendant:
Aminokit Laboratories, Inc. , Tamea Rae Sisco , Johnathan Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Runnels v. Housing Authority of the City of Beggs et al
as 6:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Malcom Runnels
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the City of Beggs, Gail Ellis, Bill Wilburn and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Parrish v. Waddington, et al
as 12-3094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS WADDINGTON, Warden and PAUL RUNNELS, Unit Team Counselor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
