Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SMITH v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE RUPERT SMITH
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and TRACY JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. NOBLES et al
as 1:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE RUPERT SMITH
Defendant:
BENJIE NOBLES, JUDY HENDRICKS, MARK WOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Corizon Health Services et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Carl Rupert Smith
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Nurse Ellis, Ms. Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. PHILBIN
as 1:2014cv00228
Petitioner:
Lawrence Rupert Smith
Respondent:
EDWARD TED PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. PHILBIN
as 5:2014cv00418
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE RUPERT SMITH
Respondent:
EDWARD TED PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2014cv05704
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rupert Smith and Josephine Wade Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Forniss et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2012cv00975
Plaintiff:
Carl Rupert Smith
Defendant:
Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baxter-Smallwood et al v. Remington Holdings, L.P. et al
as 6:2011cv01829
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Baxter-Smallwood , Denise Baxter-Smallwood , Gary Brazowski and others
Defendant:
Remington Holdings, L.P. , Ashford WQ Hotel, LP , Ashford WQ Hotel GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence Smith v. William Terry, et al
as 10-14600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE RUPERT SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM TERRY, Warden, MIZELL DAVIS, Deputy Warden, JOAN M. NEWMAN, Health Services Administrator and others
Smith v. Terry et al
as 5:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Rupert Smith
Defendant:
William Terry, Mizell Davis, Joan M Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
