Cases 21 - 30 of 116
United States of America v. Jones et al
as 5:2020cv04071
Defendant:
Crystal Lynn Jones, Crystal Lynn Geringer, Rush County, Kansas and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rush v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv01036
Plaintiff:
Rory S Rush
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. 1342 S East Ellicott Road, Calhan, Colorado et al
as 1:2020cv01662
Defendant:
1342 S East Ellicott Road, Calhan, Colorado, 6801 Mitchell Circle, Tampa, Florida, 33634, 39480 Highway 94, Rush, Colorado and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Spalt v. PACCAR, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00250
Defendant:
PACCAR, Inc., PACCAR Financial Corp. and Rush Truck Centers of Oklahoma, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edward Taylor Spalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rendic v. Minor et al
as 2:2020cv00150
Defendant:
Todd Hunter, Carter Rush Pilcher Minor and Kramerica Industries of Idaho
Plaintiff:
Dino Rendic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rushing v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00022
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamar Rushing
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00254
Plaintiff:
Lee Rushing Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Khan v. Barela, et al
as 19-2056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIK BILAL KHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU BEAM, CHRIS BARELA, JASON DURAN and others
Otter Products, LLC et al v. Mobile Rush Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00512
Defendant:
John Doe 7, Menachem Wilmowsky, John Doe 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Treefrog Developments, Inc. and Otter Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
