Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Behovitz et al v. Barry, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Brian Behovitz, George Brunette, Michael Burns and others
Defendant:
Barry, County of, Susan VandeCar, Muskegon, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Rushing vs. Grand Rapids Police Department
as 1:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Shaun Rushing
Defendant:
Grand Rapids Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rushing v. Western Michigan University
as 1:2021cv00968
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Shaun Rushing
Defendant:
Western Michigan University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rushing v. United States District Court Western District of Michigan
as 1:2021cv00743
Plaintiff:
Shaun Rushing and RESTRICTED FILER Shaun Rushing
Defendant:
US District Court Western District of Kallomazoo and United States District Court Western District of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart #507710 v. Rush et al
as 2:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Tristina Smith, J. Rush, Unknown Bernhardt and others
Plaintiff:
James Stewart #507710
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00200
Petitioner:
Nicko Ray Rush, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rush #267008 v. Newcomb
as 2:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
Darnell Rush #267008
Defendant:
S. L. Newcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rushing v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Lynne L. Rushing
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rush et al v. Lansing, City of
as 1:2013cv01317
Plaintiff:
Mary Rush
Defendant:
Lansing, City of and Brian Rendon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aupperlee et al v. Battle Creek, City of
as 1:2013cv01080
Plaintiff:
Todd Aupperlee , Scott Barnes , Bradley Barney and others
Defendant:
Battle Creek, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
