Cases 21 - 30 of 256
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Armetter Rush et al
as 3:2020cv00511
Defendant:
Geico General Insurance Company, Geico General Indemnity Company, Armetter Rush and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushing et al v. Foremost Insurance Group et al
as 5:2020cv00154
Plaintiff:
Monique Rushing and Lindell D. Rushing
Defendant:
John Does and Foremost Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Taylor et al
as 1:2020cv00226
Plaintiff:
Timothy Nelson Evans
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Terryl Rushing
Respondent:
Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moon v. Sollie et al
as 3:2020cv00112
Defendant:
Major Mellissa McCarthy, Officer Gowdy, Nurse Daphne Barr and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jason A. Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutto, III v. Taylor et al
as 3:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor and Lynn Fitch
Plaintiff:
James Hutto, III
Interested Party:
Terryl Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Ridgeland Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Detective Adrian Ready, Ridgeland Police Department and Asst. Store Manager Kenisa Rush
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Antonio Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2019cv00920
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff Victor Mason, Richard Fielder, Mary Rushing and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Deangelo Stevenson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
